He dubbed Valdes-Scantling as "our speed guy," given his penchant for catching deep balls.Īt this point, the top of the Packers' depth chart at receiver includes Allen Lazard, Randall Cobb and second-year pro Amari Rodgers. LaFleur called Adams their "separator" because of the precise way the All-Pro ran routes and created space, even against double-teams. We lost a guy that was pretty good at doing that." "We need a legit guy that can take off the top of the coverage. "Certainly, if you look at our roster right now, we definitely need to get some speed in that room," LaFleur said Tuesday at the NFL owners meetings in Palm Beach, Florida.
#Packer news free
The Green Bay Packers have a glaring weakness at wide receiver after trading Davante Adams to the Las Vegas Raiders and losing Marquez Valdes-Scantling to the Kansas City Chiefs in free agency.Ĭoach Matt LaFleur isn't trying to hide it, and he knows they have to do something significant to address issues at the position. Green Bay Packers trying to address weakness at wide receiver position
#Packer news upgrade
Cap, contract and market information via Spotrac.You have reached a degraded version of because you're using an unsupported version of Internet Explorer.įor a complete experience, please upgrade or use a supported browser *Advanced statistics from Pro Football Reference. General manager Brian Gutekunst will likely approach Bakhtiari with a restructuring offer first, but moving on altogether may be a move the Packers ultimately have to make-an easier one to swallow if Rodgers' time in Green Bay is over. The Packers could save $17.5 million of that by releasing him with a post-June 1 designation. However, with the quarterback's future uncertain, cutting Bakhtiari is something Green Bay must at least consider.īakhtiari is scheduled to carry a $28.8 million cap hit in 2023. Keeping Bakhtiari makes sense if Rodgers is committed to 2023 and beyond.
#Packer news full
He has not played a full season since his 2019 campaign. The problem is that the 31-year-old has struggled to stay on the field in recent seasons.īakhtiari suffered a torn ACL in 2020, missed almost all of 2021 and missed time in 2022 following an emergency appendectomy. Left tackle David Bakhtiari is among the NFL's best linemen when he's healthy. Pairing Dillon with a complementary free agent or rookie draft pick should give Green Bay a quality rushing attack while potentially saving millions in much-needed cap space. He logged 770 rushing yards, 206 receiving yards and seven touchdowns this season while splitting time with Jones. While Dillon hasn't been as prolific as Jones, he has the potential to be a very good starter. The Packers also have to consider that they have 24-year-old AJ Dillon in the backfield as well.
While the 28-year-old ball carrier is unquestionably valuable to the Packers offense, his salary is simply too high for a team on the precipice of a likely rebuild. That would provide a huge amount of cap relief. Green Bay could save $16 million of that by releasing or trading Jones with a June 1 designation. Jones is set to carry a massive (for a running back) $20 million cap hit in 2023. Would the Packers really part with a running back who logged 1,121 rushing yards and 395 receiving yards in 2022? While it might seem unlikely, parting with Aaron Jones is a move Green Bay must at least consider.
With this in mind, let's examine three players the Packers must at least consider cutting before free agency begins on March 15. Trading him before then would cost an extra $8.6 million in dead cap.Ī post-June 1 trade would save the Packers $15.8 million against the 2023 cap, but would a team be willing to wait that long to finalize a trade? If the Packers want to maximize their quarterback's trade value, it would behoove them to move Rodgers sooner than later.Įven if Rodgers stays put for 2023, the Packers need to clear some cap room. Cutting Rodgers before June 1 would create an additional $68.2 million in cap deficit. Rodgers has $99.8 million in dead money left on his deal. The problem with trading or releasing Rodgers is this: Green Bay is already set to be $17.4 million over the salary cap. "Those sources also believe that Rodgers is well aware of the Packers' feelings on the situation."
"League sources believe the franchise prefers to move on from Rodgers, just as it once did with Brett Favre," ESPN's Adam Schefter wrote on Sunday. Green Bay fell short of the playoffs in 2022 and it may now look to move on from longtime starting quarterback Aaron Rodgers. The Green Bay Packers face a very daunting offseason. Packers RB Aaron Jones Patrick McDermott/Getty Images
0 kommentar(er)
